Friday, December 16, 2005

Disagreeing on Iraq

Nancy Pelosi yesterday told the Washington Post that it's OK for Democrats to disagree about getting out of Iraq:
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said yesterday that Democrats should not seek a unified position on an exit strategy in Iraq, calling the war a matter of individual conscience and saying differing positions within the caucus are a source of strength for the party.
Pelosi said Democrats will produce an issue agenda for the 2006 elections but it will not include a position on Iraq. There is consensus within the party that President Bush has mismanaged the war and that a new course is needed, but House Democrats should be free to take individual positions, she said.
The differing positions on withdrawal from Iraq are part of an open discussion, something the country should have had three years ago using all of the intelligence available. Unfortunately, the intelligence we did hear about was either cherry-picked, doctored or simply made up. The Washington Post also reports what we all know -- that Bush knew more about Iraq than he told Congress:
A congressional report made public yesterday concluded that President Bush and his inner circle had access to more intelligence and reviewed more sensitive material than what was shared with Congress when it gave Bush the authority to wage war against Iraq.
The report, done by the Congressional Research Service at the request of Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), comes amid allegations by Democrats that administration officials exaggerated Iraq's weapons capabilities and terrorism ties and then resisted inquiries into the intelligence failures.
Bush has fiercely rejected those claims. "Some of the most irresponsible comments -- about manipulating intelligence -- have come from politicians who saw the same intelligence I saw and then voted to authorize the use of force against Saddam Hussein," he said this week.


Post a Comment

<< Home