tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11210638.post5703284108118548080..comments2009-10-22T08:46:15.557-04:00Tom Noyeshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05304960210838414244noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11210638.post-32578258141713614522009-10-22T08:46:15.557-04:002009-10-22T08:46:15.557-04:00Not to mention that timing is everything...Nancy Willinghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05874107554093904872noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11210638.post-8351433669674033692009-10-20T15:41:45.608-04:002009-10-20T15:41:45.608-04:00Thanks for the suggestion. I suspect that having the Times, Reuters and other big news organizations was a bigger story.TommyWonkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05304960210838414244noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11210638.post-78781964351295089712009-10-20T07:22:05.523-04:002009-10-20T07:22:05.523-04:00WOW, Rachel Maddow would have loved to have known that a dedicated environmental blogger was caught up in the hoax, if only twenty minutes worth. <br /><br />She covered the story with video feed and commentary from a Mother Jones reporter who already had had heads up on the joke.<br /><br />You ought to email this in to MNBC to see if she wants to follow up on the angle. :-)Nancy Willinghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05874107554093904872noreply@blogger.com